• Donald Trump vs Jews
Migrants make Germany dumb". I don't want to go into detail; there will probably be many more similar articles on the web. Their net contribution to intellectual life was, if anything, negative; and their net economic contribution was negative. On the Iran deal, there's an aspect which hardly anyone understands yet: It is better that a hundred guilty men go free, than one innocent man be jailed - an example of protheseology:
canada online gambling taxable
Well, he conforms to what almost all Jews think is in their interest. The story of Jewish collaborators through the centuries hasn't begun to be described yet. At the present time, all the costs for nonwhite immigration into white countries are added to debts of the white inhabitants, into the indefinite future, preferably on an unpayable basis. Are you a fan of the chambray shirt? If you plan to wear your chambray along with a suit, stick to minimal details with regular buttons.
I am breaking the long silence with a denim jacket that has got me exited recently. It has features from both MJ11 and MJ jackets. As always is the case with RRL denim pieces, the quality of the denim is great. RRL has been using Japanese denim in the past but recently also Cone. I have always been fan of the RRL line. There has been really well made garments in the past seasons. They are using the historical models and tweaking them in to modern use and fit. When denim jackets are concerned, there has been RRL repros of classic Lee and Levis jackets before as well as this Wrangler.
And that is ok in my book — especially when the pieces are done as well as RRL does them. On the other hand, there are so many brands in Japan that are doing that, so why not one based in the US.
This brings me to the one problem I have with RRL. Their boots, jeans and denim jackets are made in the USA but rest of the line mostly in China and occasionally in other parts of Asia. This is where I think that RRL should take new approach.
The brand has such a strong American heritage image that it is almost unforgivable that large majority of the stuff is made in China. I have no doubt that there are skilled garment makers also in China and other parts of Asia. Classic Wrangler Blue Bell front with one pleat and dot tacs. One pocket with a pen slot and RRL western stitching. The placement of the pocket is relatively high, almost touching the front yoke.
Hand warmer pockets and five button closure. In the back the cinch straps are borrowed from the earlier Wrangler models. I prefer this older cinch. They were traditionally connected inside to wide elastic straps to create a moving gussets and to give more flex to the shoulder blade area.
This is a functional detail and very comfortable for the wearer. The Church became a huge landowner. In effect, there were urban money handlers; the rest of Christian countries was largely dominated by the Church, which must have had financial systems to buy land—probably by Jews.
This side of the Church is largely hidden; when have you seen commentators on Church money during the Middle Ages? Probably the Church kept the monopoly for Jews. But probably Churchmen were concerned primarily with their power and income. When the storms passed, the heretical points at issue became almost impossible to remember. This is presented as a response to shock at the contents.
But of course this had the effect of removing Judaic material and making criticism impossible. It seems unlikely this was for the benefit of criminals; more likely—as in North American cities now—it provided a safe space for Jewish fraudsters. Usury with lifetime earnings penalties, wars, armies and land grabs, huge taxes, engineered bank and repayment crashes, depressions, famines, genocides Presumably there must have been intermittent battles with aristocrats and farmers and miners and child-rearers and makers of buildings, shipping, carts, bridges, and all the rest of it.
Between them, at intervals, Jews and churches must have picked on promising new targets. I'm saying the entire history of the Roman Catholic Church has been misunderstood!: This is important, because it helps explain the continual drumbeat push for 'Holocaustianity' by Jews.
Fanatical Jewish liars—Spielberg, Jewish media, even Church of England, Roman Catholic church, people like Lipstadt, 'Hollywood', are promoting 'Holocaustianity', with fictional 6 million replacing the one fiction of Jesus.
With monuments, fake saints, fake shrines, and all the rest of it. I'd like to suggest a new word, a neologism to cover the real function of 'political correctness' and Jewspeak. Everyone knows what ' teleology ' means: Why did God make trees? Why do rabbits have white tails? Why is a moon up there? These are teleological arguments. Why is racism bad? What is a conspiracy theory? What is a fascist?
Islam is nothing but peaceful! In each case, the intention is to bias the discussion towards what Jews all think is their interest. Protheseological arguments all have in mind a bias; usually these arguments are made by Jews and their puppets, and usually learned parrot fashion. It is better that a hundred guilty men go free, than one innocent man be jailed - an example of protheseology: This is not a very happy neologism, though I like the pun with prosthetics. But perhaps there's something better?
I had intended to discuss evolution of human characteristics: They may have got the idea from Egyptian or Babylonian writing on walls: It may be the case that whites have a tendency, an instinct, to take interest in discrete topics—everything from growing vegetables to playing croquet, from working with fire to collecting silver. It may be that parasitism, secrecy, cunning, lies, hate are mental characteristics, some dominant, some recessive—perhaps simpler than seems possible at present.
Maybe memories work differently—some recalling insults, others lessons, others triumphs. A Plea for Talk We arguably! Perhaps using their tactics back at them, instead of being defensive: Daily, so it becomes ingrained in peoples' minds not to trust them, then we can start getting control of the real estate, the commodities, the weapons, books, publishing companies, cable TV, movie theaters, etc. So, learn to think on a large scale: If you print money, you can invent a newspaper!
And you can invent entire TV channels, and movie outlets. Remember everything they show you is arranged and scripted and edited. Don't be impressed by fines and penalties, which sound high, but in comparison with crimes have practically no effect.
Think of government debt the way Jews do, but draw the opposite conclusions from them. When you see an advertising campaign, remember someone planned it all; don't be impressed, don't think it was your idea.
When you see Jew militarists wanting a war talk of 'our' policy, consider if it actually is. Consider the Jewish 'nation' as a thin layer spread over the world: Think of Stalin, Roosevelt, Churchill, and Hitler; could they all have been carefully placed?
If you owned news outlets round the world, and public opinion survey companies, why not invent stories for different parts of the world, in their own languages? On a large scale, try to analyse possible false flags: Try to imagine material that has been deliberately cut out: Try to grow some ideas up—don't be like Christian South African old soldiers who believe in Noah's Ark.
Remember the obscurity of much of the past: Always Remember This One Thing! Five or six things at the back of my mind struck me: Malthus's essay and further versions had little to say about wars, despite famines and other hardships during and after Napoleon. Overpopulation is a bourgeois myth— or so expression by some 'left wingers' or 'Marxists' Overpopulation as an issue discussed in the Jewish media apparently seriously and worryingly.
Ehrlich not the scientist was a typical name. Contraception advice was to be free etc, but of course coloured invaders were inexplicably omitted. In fact this 'boom' was more or less mythical, though Americans in sheep fashion continue to use the expression.
This of course in retrospect was obviously Jewish manipulation, just as Jewish brightly-coloured magazines carry population and race messages.
Note the complete elision of population concerns in the mass media, after Jews decided to flood white countries with immigrants. Non-Jews started to realise population growth in Africans is probably the biggest population problem the world has ever had, but Jewish-funded groups ignore this—at least in public demonstrations, while building walls in Palestine. A dismissive remark on Malthus in a 'history' volume by the Jew Eric Hobsbawm.
I can't be bother to find the exact wording, but it was, roughly, Malthus was not an important thinker. So what is going on here? Of course the truth is simple: Jews have sufficient stranglehold to direct wars: And there's suppression of discussion of post-war facts: Black Lives Matter and other Jew-funded hate groups. If some black punches some white, it follows Jew propaganda, just as much as Brits and Germans fighting each other, Americans bombing Afghans Just as the Jewish systematic lying about the Holohoax and about genuine Jew mass murders must lead thoughtful people to reconsider the past of other religions, so must systematic Jew lies about wars lead to re-examination.
It's clear enough that England was involved in the greatest number of wars in Europe over the last 4 or more centuries, though the beneficiaries, Jews have so far not been identified.
I'd suggest the reason for Hobsbawm's dismissal of Malthus is simply that Jews have covertly been responsible for more wars and famines than anything that could be called natural. In fact, I'd suggest the reason that Malthus was hyped and promoted was precisely because he misdirected people from Jews' roles in the 'French' Revolution. Giving housing to nonwhite invaders is a Jewish trick related to Malthus. If housing is supplied, human populations may well go up; 'studies show' this is a Jewish phrase.
Subsidised housing, at the expense of the white indigenous populations, is something Malthus would recognise, though in his time there was very little equivalent. Apologies for unintentional harsh wordings or misconceptions. Another Jewish Invasion of England , which makes the case for the Wars of the Roses being essentially staged, as a precursor to the change in the monarchy from Plantagenets to Tudors.
This pushes back revisionism from Cromwell's wars and invitation of Jews c. Henry VII seems something of an oddity: David Starkey, in a minor piece of revisionism, established that his death was kept secret while arrangements were made behind the scenes. The several pretenders were 'outed' by an MP, I think in the s, pointing out they were part of Jewish infiltration.
Mathis, by careful examination of what is published about marriages and families, considers that the island of Anglesey is a key to these events. Note incidentally the English-sounding name, Anglesey. Anglesey is mentioned in Julius Caesar—one of his economic reasons for invading England was wheat, from Anglesey; plus tin, lead, cattle. This is from memory. And note the geographical position: Anglesey has a mild climate the Gulf Stream helps , and has naturally sheltered harbours.
Without going into detail, which in any case I don't know, sailing ships for preference need sheltered harbours, landmarks in a literal sense to demonstrate they're on the right course for the area they want, consistent but not overpowering winds 'trade winds' more or less behind them. And not too many rocks and sandbanks and unknowns. These are technical details, and I'm assuming Anglesey must have fulfilled them. Hilaire Belloc wrote on the likely landing-place s of Caesar, based on his personal knowledge of sailing, and this sort of thing is needed to assess Anglesey.
Mathis's hypothesis is based on evidence that Jew traders in largish numbers lived in Anglesey. His novelty is showing the likelihood that the Wars of the Roses were staged: Lancashire is near enough, and Yorkshire to its east.
Many people have noticed the 'wars' were exceptionally polite and gentlemanly; most people living there had no idea there was a war. Some people have assumed this was typical of the time, and that more recent wars show a descent into barbarism, as of course they do. But the horrific 'harrying of the north' in England years earlier suggests, what is perhaps obvious, that there was little violence because it wasn't needed.
Bear in mind that when the Tudor dynasty started or usurped , the Americas were not yet discovered; Anglesey was on the edge of the world. Rabelais and the general westward movement of civilisation or 'civilisation' was in the future. And bear in mind that Anglesey may have been important as a shelter and bolt-hole and supplier of money; wheat presumably could have come from the entire surrounding area, not just the island itself.
I will not repeat Mathis' conclusions here, not wishing to steal his thunder. But it's an important new idea in piecing together true history.
Mathis seems to have noticed things which escaped British historians: His paper on J K Rowling suggests the same thing: Many people think 'usury' simply means interest payments. This is probably intentional misrepresentation. Let me quote from my piece on 'Jews' from The Merchant of Venice: And if the sums are not repaid on time Then, as forfeit, they would take everything; All that the man has earned in his lifetime In other words, usury is the practice of seizing everything of a debtor if he defaults.
The plot in The Merchant of Venice of course revolved around Shylock wanting a death penalty for Antonio's default for a loan on his argosies, which were believed to have sunk. Interest is not the important issue; the aim must have been to seize property. How this worked in practice must be difficult to establish: But the point here can be made by considering the present century or two. Now, paper money is under Jewish control; the greater the debt of a country, the more interest is expected by Jews.
This of course is the reason they build up debts. At the present time, all the costs for nonwhite immigration into white countries are added to debts of the white inhabitants, into the indefinite future, preferably on an unpayable basis.
Science and technology frauds are enormous. Over-lending seems to be an unremarked aspect of all the times when Jews had power. Consider, for example, castles: How many country houses were needed in England, after Cromwell, in the 18th century? How many Cathedrals and churches were needed? Albania according to Wikipedia had by a total of , bunkers. Taking a long view, the system seems to have been to make loans at high interest, and encourage overspending; seize assets and ruin defaulters, and usurp elites, usually by a divide-and-rule process.
The traditional Roman Catholic objection to usury may not be what it seems. The origins of Christianity are very likely insistent Jewish repetition, and the use of faked scriptures: I'd like to suggest the thundering rejection of usury was only aimed at the faithful, the naive and scared 'goyim'. Economic power in this way being divided between the Church and Jews, the Church, no doubt for a price, using religious authority to allow Jews to practise usury with no competition.
Jews would of course ignore Papal bulls. The more repeats, the slower the migration in something like gelatine, when driven by a small electric current. This is analogous to analysing a DVD by looking for repeats of 4 characters in the bit stream, then tabulating them.
Or, more understandable but less accurate, getting the 'fingerprint' of a book by counting the number of occurrences of 'the' on each line, and drawing a bar on a graph for 0, 1, 2, 3 etc appearances. Not a very good analogy; I can't think of a better one.
The point is that it has no connection with the living thing that it came from. Now, biological science is in censored chaos, as the works of Harold Hillman and others show. Compounded errors of interpretation of techniques have built up a house of cards.
In short, DNA analyses are suspect, and depend on repeatability: But of course there are practical issues: It's of some concern that Professor Alec Jeffreys, who works or worked at Leicester University, shares his place of learning with a 'Holocaust' fraud outfit.
In practical terms, it's of enormous public interest that human genetics should be understood. The whole basis of practical Jewishness depends on mothers, and yet it's obvious that infiltration by marriage, while helping concealment, also halves what 'Jewish' DNA there may have been. At present, there are serious suggestions that Jews should move into China by intermarriage. No doubt there's some selection by personality type: I've attempted to discuss these issues with people supposedly competent in genetics, but of course at present they are far too cowardly to do this.
No Christians were ever thrown to lions there. Was early Christianity Hijacked or Invented by Jews? Updated 12 Dec , 7 Jan , 25 June Notes on Islam, Quakers, Marxism, and the United Nations added to the end of this article This is an idea new to me, and perhaps genuinely new: Projecting this characteristic backwards in time, we start from the consideration that Christianity took centuries to become established.
That time might have been used by Jews to change the whole of the ideas and beliefs of Christianity, and pretend it was Jewish all along. Jewish plagiarism and dishonesty are commonplace; I've tried to write a brief examination of this possibility, kept short to reduce opportunities for timewasters. Here are a few starting-point puzzles: Why not just have Christian material? I'm agnostic about the Latin Roman Catholic and presumably Greek Byzantine versions; for all I know the 'Old Testament' might have been treated as inferior, or consisted of different books.
Hoping to be clear, I'm saying the 'Old Testament' and 'New Testament' may have both been utterly irrelevant to early Christians. If early Christians used their own written material, it may have had just their own material—beliefs across the Roman Empire, and new ethical beliefs for example, peace across the Empire.
I'm pointing out that Jews are chronic liars, and, if they sensed a new important movement, may well have tried to control it—and inserting their own rubbish would seem natural to them. Remember they had a few centuries to adjust history, and we're living through something similar now.
Jews have no hesitation in manufacturing fake history, as the present day proves, and there's no reason why they shouldn't have done this to profit from early Christianity] Early Christianity seems to have been named after the Greek word meaning 'illuminated' or 'golden' , in a similar sense to 'the light of the world' or 'bright spirit'.
Hence the chi-rho and fish symbol. No 'Jesus' character whatsoever. The Romans appear to have had the idea of amalgamating and collecting together parts of extant religions from their part of the world , with the intention of psychologically unifying their unstable empire. Sensible enough, and perhaps a precursor to the idea of 'conversion', which must have seemed a new outlook to tribal peoples.
Much of the ancient world survives to this day: Many shared to some extent with Sanskrit and Into-European roots. Why would a Roman-empire wide religion not be made up of such elements?
Constantine's genuine or supposed conversion in A. Evidence shows Jews have no scruples in manufacturing or destroying evidence. Evidence shows Jews may claim to have invented or originated anything considered desirable.
Modern evidence shows Jews, if they lied to claim to have taken part in establishing Christianity, will lie more, claiming progressively more influence over the past. Whether ancient 'Jews' are related to modern 'Jews' is a controversial question; but the same written 'laws' and stories can reasonably be supposed to affect populations subject to them in similar ways.
Ancient 'Jews' must therefore be suspected of being persistent liars, too. A popular religion, perhaps Roman-slave-based, or perhaps more generally based, which professed to enlighten people, might reasonably be expected to include elements from Roman, perhaps with other tribal and national elements.
There might for example have been books of Persian beliefs, of Babylonian beliefs, of Egyptian beliefs, of Greek beliefs, of Roman beliefs, and other long-established written sources.
No doubt with then-modern Christian material, showing why they were wrong or obsolete or unenlightened. I'd like to suggest there may have been a process, over several centuries, in which Jews made up their own stories about 'Jeshua', also known as 'the Christ', or 'Jesus Christ', and insisted upon them in their Jewish group way , redefining 0 A. Three centuries is about the length of time taken for Jews to take over England, then the USA, and invent and promote bogus histories, so the time scale seems plausible enough.
I've put here a small sample of the evidence that Jesus never existed. In short, I suspect the 'Old Testament' progressively was forced into Christianity, despite having no connection whatever with the origins of Christianity.
And the 'New Testament' itself was Judaised, replacing genuine early Christian works. Here's Wheless's book Forgery in Christianity which lists assorted plagiarisms and forgeries in the early church, based on writings which survived, or allegedly survived.
Emmett Fields dated the end of US free thought to January 2, From that time on, the Federal Government waged relentless war against religious liberty. But Wheless does not think of the possibility of systematic Jewish forgery or adaptation from their own mythologies.
The idea is reinforced by plenty of modern examples of bogus religions fostered by Jews, including many aspects of the Reformation, Quakers see Miles Mathis' excellent new piece on George Fox , Mormonism, and Christian Science. This idea probably ought to be most important in the USA, which has large numbers of more or less fundamentalist types, probably only possible in a relatively rich or heavily subsidised society, with heavy Jewish control over information.
Some Americans think the Bible was written in English; some think there was an ark, built of wood from an American tree; some like the Scofield Bible; some can't understand evolution; some think that Jews were chosen by a God. These people are a danger through their stupidity and inertia, and their inability to help with anything useful in the world. It's unlikely they will change, since they have found a mental niche which they find comforting.
But I would ask as many people as possible to view their material with the skepticism which is necessary with modern Jews. The 'Acts' are not a historical record. The 'Gospels' are self-contradictory and ridiculous. These are joint, collective lies, which persist over long stretches of time. And clearly have intention behind them. Motives include promoting wars, getting the Fed for Jews, changing propaganda schemes to face new enemies or to work for new wars for Jews, continual statistical lies on e.
So we have this hypothesis  I'm saying the NT was just another set of Jewish lies. Not stories, not history, not an honest attempt at a record. But purely for Jewish aim s. Perhaps heading off an early religion in the Roman Empire, which looked likely to form a new composite religion. I won't name it, as that will confuse people. So they wrote a whole set of stories, based around 'Yeshua', almost as Spielberg composed his absurd films, Weisel orated his 'Holocaust' lies for a lifetime, or Jewish 'historians' of the holohoax orchestrate and embroider their lies.
The main point was to get them out, published, available to be forced onto people; further detail could come after. This time frame is similar to e. I've seen the argument that US Jewish-controlled 'Universities' now all accept the Bible as reliable—'proof', since even Marxists accept this. But of course if the whole thing was a Jewish set of stories, they would be likely to support it, whatever the evidence.
All they had to do was put forward their own lies and—provided there was sufficient promotional push and destruction of opposition—Piso would be forgotten. Jews often do this; for example, the leading physicist over the last few centuries was Newton, so Einstein was manufactured as a substitute. To take a totally different example, the Beatles were one of the most influential music groups of the 20th century. If Jews started a promotional myth that 'The Bagels' were the best ever, with their famous 'Abbey Schul' and 'Light Blue Double Album' achievements, who can tell whether this would be accepted in years' time?
But it is exactly the same policy that Jews follow: I'd suggest all, or most, persecution of 'heretics' was in effect by Jews. And ditto with censorship and destruction of books, however innocent or instructional. Books were fairly freely available during Greek and Roman times, and it's therefore likely works on paganism, or true history, or Jewish lies, or Europeans and Africans and Asians, would have been destroyed by Jews.
Because of the obscurity of early Christians, intelligent people will be cautious; online sources claim the first fifteen Popes were Jewish, but this turns out to mean that some organisation in Jerusalem is claimed to have had 15 leaders in about years, presumably 'Jews'.
Even the title and meaning of 'Pope' isn't clear. For example, scene-setting and opinion-setting. Many Jewish films start with fictional stuff on how actress X is the most beautiful woman in the world, collecting her beauty award, and gasped at by big crowds. In the same way, the 'Jesus' figure is supported by miracles, impossible events, epigrams supposed to suggest wisdom, marvels, scatterings of enemies, etc etc. Rather oddly, this feature seems to be the basis of many people's reaction, which is that the Bible is full of reliable and accurate material—something like the opposite of the truth.
AND NOTE that the Catholic Church of course was fronted by non-Jews, most of the time , but they had their own views on what issues mattered, leading to interminable cryptic disputes. No doubt the Roman Empire's collapse was helped by such rented people diverting assets away from the state, and away from ordinary people.
A situation recognisably similar to the present day. If you see my point, I'd welcome serious comments. I'd particularly welcome comment on Churches post- about AD, and interactions between Jews and non-Jews, and on e. And the invention of Islam, and the Khazar issue. And of course promotion of wars and invasions, as parallels with modern times. Discoveries of new territories and the corresponding increases in ease of travel. Any insights, based on the idea that the Bible was a Jewish promo job; what were they trying to promote, in different eras?
There may well be insights waiting to be seen and outed! The New Testament does not mention Christianity at all—understandably, as the Church did not exist at the time.
So if some other religion say, Mithraism, or Gnosticism, or RomanEmpirism, or Anythingism, or pan-Paganism, or revivedBabylonism had emerged, the NT could be used against them, so Jews could muscle in. They may have prepared stories, later dropped, to plan for these eventualities—in the same way modern 'Jews' prepare media campaigns against Germans, Vietnamese, whites, Iraqis, Moslems etc.
Knowledge by acquaintance is arguably simpler—just a matter of senses and memory of nearby things and events. But knowledge by description has the feature that it may be incorrect. People may believe things which are totally wrong, misleading, inaccurate, or whatever.
How are they to know whether they're being lied to? A good case can be made for credulity being partly genetic: This is not an issue which arises much with animals: So there is a lot to be said for young children believing what they are told.
But if scepticism and logic and curiosity vary genetically, it must be possible for different patterns to develop: The Khazar hypothesis that so-called 'Jews' were a mass conversion, with no genetic connection with Jews is more credible than many people like to believe, because the fanatical elements in judaism—expulsion or deaths for nonbelievers, more children for their priest caste, discreet killings of non-members, firm belief based on zero evidence—would feed back over the generations to produce a Jew-like population.
I'd like to suggest Christianity had a similar genetic effect over many generations, making populations move over to credulousness and away from logical thought. My online chats with believers incline me to think so. As with Judaism, killings of heretics, insistence on repeated fairy tales, penalties for critics, must have a long-term effect over many generations. The same must apply to Islam. It seems possible to me that Christianity had the good luck to be optional, unlike the monolithic fanatical tribal 'religions' of Jews, Muslims, and many others.
That is to say, it had a specialised caste with no definite power over non-Christians, so that experimenters, philosophers, and others could exist, if not flourish. At present, there's a gulf between people who, though recognising the difficulties, see that scientific thought and logical debate must be the way forward; and a vast mass of believers in emotional assertiveness, unevidenced misinformation, and wishful thinking.
A longer and more detailed book is Prof. Neither of these authors, Robertson or Wells, has any concept of 'Kosher' forces which successfully agitated for, then imposed, 'Jesus Christ' on top of early Christianity, which, if it even existed as a genuine non-Jewish movement, had no place for a 'Yeshua'. Prometheus Books is an arm of the 'skeptics', US people funded by Jews; Wells would not have been published, had he been Jew-aware. Helps Pave the Way for Future Understanding. Review by Rerevisionist, Jan 7th, I have a copy of this book, in the original small-format red hardback of the 'Thinker's Library'.
First printed , second edition There are other editions, some, I think, more or less pirated; or perhaps the copyright situation isn't clear. Whether these are accurate, I don't know; for interested readers I'd recommend an original copy, just in case.
The contents are more or less chronological, with Chapter 1 containing Christian writings, Chapter 2 writings by everyone else—with some overlap—and Chapter 3 leaping forward to post-Reformation times, no doubt because criticism of the Bible in the Middle Ages is difficult to find.
I'd guess Robertson—British son of a theologian in Durham, and impeccably public-schooled and degreed—absorbed much of the material in his father's house. I haven't found any supposed texts showing the existence of Jesus, not found in Robertson. The book has a fairly detailed helpful index. My view is that, at the time of the various commentators, nobody influential appreciated the fact the Jews, who were, presumably, behind the Jesus promotion, seem to have a genetic tendency to lie —something which may go back to the days when language was still developing, in the remotest depths of time.
Much as visual camouflage would not have evolved until sight had developed, modes of use of language could not predate speech. It's now clear that Jews have an exceptional tendency to lie—this may be compared to some creatures which lie [pun not really intended!
Before the days of technological aids, such as writing, and, now, photographs and fingerprints and videos etc etc etc, convincing liars must have been hard to detect. It's now plausible that Jews made up the 'New Testament' as a Jewish fantasy, or film script, or advertisement, or promotion of a Jewish 'hero' aimed at gullible goyim. It's what they do. People who describe Christianity as a 'Jewish Trojan horse' are no doubt correct. The idea that there was a ferment of religious ideas in the Roman Empire may also be untrue.
It's now known that Jewish strategies include defaming and subverting and critiquing rival societies; it's entirely likely the supposed unease leading to religious change was a Jewish manufacture.
The remaining problem is how Jews could have done this; they didn't have the Federal Reserve to print them endless money. They may have had the ear of prominent Romans. They may have used unreliable, dysfunctional, disgruntled people to spread the world, much as non-Jewish 'Marxists' now, and in the past, often fit this description, and often co-operate in treachery which is mildly profitable to them. A modern question which may occur to the reader is why a Jew-based publishing house should risk subverting their racial group with a serious presentation of the idea of the non-existence of 'Yeshua'.
There have been alternations in self-images of Christians, and I'd guess their feeling was that Christians in were a bit too independent. The story of Jewish collaborators through the centuries hasn't begun to be described yet. Treating the tedious 'epistles' which preceded the 'Gospels' as genuine or faked doesn't really matter. The advertising and promotional aspect is the important thing. Wikipedia, the guaranteed easily-available source of US-Jew-approved deception, says Early Christianity was the 'period of Christianity preceding the First Council of Nicaea in This is of course absurd—as though Christians would say, I'll know what I believe when a council I've never heard of makes its ruling.
But it is all 'Jewish'. Wikipedia has no entry for 'primitive Christianity', propbably a useful phrase to refer to beliefs before Jews intervened. Let me try again to get the concept across to the brainwashed.
Imagine the world develops, somewhere, a new movement: Suppose a belief system develops, which might be described as a religion; it doesn't really matter. The people call themselves Peacists, talk about Peacism, regard Peacism as an important part of their lives. Peacism, if it's lucky, spreads, irregularly; 'Peacism' becomes a part, if a small part, of life in its corner of the world.
There may be some Peacists who become well-known. The doctrines of Peacism lead to poems and jokes about it, achievements and commentaries and practical effects, donations, converts, de-converts, meetings, songs, buildings. The thesis I'm making is based on the facts about 'Holocaustianity', a religion based on pure fraud in which all Jews at the present time are united. Advertising, deception, bribery of pseudo-academics, control over media, legal controls and all the rest of it are probably known to readers here.
What, drawing lessons from 'Holocaustianity', might have been the stages in the invention of Christianity as it is now perceived? Now suppose a group with influence and absurd ideas about themselves see this new group, and want to colonise it, much as they might want to rule a new country.
Although they have had no interest in Peacism, slowly a new name will be made up and promoted, let's say Menache Peacst. Slowly, but increasingly, the works of Menarche, the miracles of Menarche, the sayings of Menarche, the travels of Menarche appear in booklets, books, talks by odd-looking men, and so on. An ever-growing flood of words, attributed to Menarche Peacst, drowns out the original Peacists, in spite of their protestations and indignation.
The Peacst is praised, Menarche is praised, the life of Menarche is written about by scriptwriters—even though Menarche never existed in fact. A Darwinian process means that stories about Menarche Peacst grow some appealing aspects, and shed some absurdities and errors. In a few hundred years, the original beliefs of Peacism are all but lost, and any books or documents are destroyed ruthlessly by Peacst followers, anxious to remove evidence, and wanting to remove all trace of the genuine beliefs of Peacism.
For 'Menarche Peacst' read 'Yeshua Christ'—translated as 'Jesus'—where the opinions of early Christians are effaced by the intruded Jewish fake, so much so that almost everyone assumes unthinkingly that Christians, who started originally as 'golden' or 'enlightened', are synonymous with 'Jesus Christ'. By this stage, collaborators can be bought, and are likely to have a similar temperament: Miles Mathis suggests very convincingly that Quakers were encouraged.
I owe to Miles W Mathis the attitude that 'Marxism' was a manufactured set of beliefs, plagiarised or made up by Jews, designed to support what they think are their interests.
The Communist Manifesto , for example, was plagiarised. For Jews, notably absent in creative impulses—no art, buildings, food, clothes, literature to speak of, inventions, science; only their traditional low-grade viciousness mediated by lies—it is essential to parasitise non-Jews. Jews presumably instinctively panic when thwarted, as parasites must act imperatively if they see their food and shelter being taken away.
Another possibility which only occurred to me today, reviewing a book by Alex Comfort. Some musings on the UN. Here's a page with essentially the same theory, earlier than mine, with Rome and Alexandria as two rival city ideological battlegrounds. Watch Jews Continue Lying!
I'm assuming it's a Jewish source; it has all the fingerprints. This is The Daily Bell. It's listed by similarweb as , worldwide, 45, in the USA it's English language. I've copied below the meat of the Daily Bell article, which as it admits, was largely taken from the entries in http: I don't want to go into detail; there will probably be many more similar articles on the web.
Let me just note a few things, and give a few sample links -- Nuclear power is not discussed. Probably because it's very much a live issue, and without much of the emotional baggage of horror attributed to 'nuclear bombs'. The likelihood it's a huge fraud, mostly Jewish, like the 'Holocaust' fraud, must of course be avoided by the controllers of Jews. A Jewish fingerprint is the invention of phrases which it's hoped by repetition in the controlled media will take hold of the stupid goyim.
For example, the Holohoax will probably be described as 'directed history' with passive implications it was e. Imabari and the antennae of Little Boy video over to the right - or Little Boys, since there were at least two! Typically of Jews, actual pioneers and discoverers are not credited. Jews are never identified by Jewish hacks: The part played by Jews in generating fears of the USSR, to keep Jewish mass murders hidden, are of course unmentioned.
Distracting and alarmist stuff seems natural to Jews. There's no evidence for a death penalty for truth-telling, any more than there was for survivors of the Liberty.
But of course steps were taken to completely censor Japanese news, European news and US news. The online article of 29 June Consider what we ["we" is the Bell article] have already uncovered just by scrutinizing the Internet and looking for evidence of "directed history" regarding the initial atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There are other disturbing elements to the Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombings, and if you are interested, you can see more documents calling many elements of the attacks into question HERE.
Tone on tone can be scary for a lot of guys. Where a lot of guys get it wrong? They outright wear the same tones of colors, when it should be a mixture of lighter and darker tones. Take a look at this example I put together.
The navy grey Lanvin suit is edging towards gray. The subtle dark navy, however, makes you look a lot more sophisticated. Brown and blue is a classic combo. These suede double monk shoes by Suit Supply give it a nice, extra formal warmth, as opposed to the high contrast a shiny leather will give off. While the brown tortoise of the glasses work beautifully with the blues of the suit and call to the shoes. Who thinks like that?
Think of mixing color like flavors in food. What do you think of when you eat mexican food? Chili powder, lime, garlic, cilantro. This look calls back to Classic American. Now, I want to hear from you. Are you a fan of the chambray shirt? Maybe you never considered it.
Iamges: dating levis trucker jacket
Jewish bankers must have paused, and it may be that Hitler was chosen as a moderate, and then watched. Amateur homemade Lonely housewife flashes plumber 2: Imagine the world develops, somewhere, a new movement:
However, it is quite uncommon to find selvage broken twill denim.
Always Remember This One Thing! The Church became a huge landowner. I found this vintage Wrangler denim jacket, and unfortunately sleeves have been cut off long time ago — but that just makes it perfect vest for the summer! Oevis a page with essentially the same theory, earlier than mine, with Rome and Alexandria as dating levis trucker jacket rival city ideological battlegrounds. Many people are aware, from nature, of predator-prey relationships.